Last check number problem (cvs version)

[Dave Peticolas]

--=-A/O5dmszpCyxMT8YMnLB
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 00:31, David Hampton wrote:
> It just occurred to me as I was writing this message that the logic of
> this test might be reversed.  That seems too simple a solution, and I
> feel like I've missed something somewhere.  I'd appreciate any pointers.

That does sound like reversed logic to me. Unless you can think
of a reason not to just reverse it, I would go ahead and submit
that patch.

thanks,
dave


--=-A/O5dmszpCyxMT8YMnLB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA8e2IP5effKKCmfpIRAvheAKDeAGzOaPf8to/GXqC6aFri0l38yACg46La
m34UO5UroTa+TT6FYI4J/Tk=
=7mLl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-A/O5dmszpCyxMT8YMnLB--