Proposal: Merge gnome2-branch into HEAD
Derek Atkins
warlord at MIT.EDU
Sun May 1 09:55:03 EDT 2005
hi,
Quoting Emmanuel Pacaud <emmanuel.pacaud at univ-poitiers.fr>:
> I guess you're talking about Goffice Graph.
yes..
> Looking at gnucash-gnome2-dev branch, it seems to use a snapshot of
> Goffice Graph from the last stable version of gnumeric.
Correct..
> You probably want to use the standalone library you can find in the
> goffice module on cvs.gnome.org. It has some crasher fixes. An unstable
> release is planned.
Unfortunately we can't...
> >> > PS: Is it really necessary to require libgnomui-2.8.0? Wouldn't
> >> > libgnomeui-2.6.1 already be sufficient?
> >>
> >> I chose 2.8 because that's what ships with FC3. As recently as a couple
> >> of weeks ago G2 was compiling on FC1 which has libgnomeui-2.4, and I
> >> haven't seen anything committed that raises that bar. I'll drop the
> >> requirement back down so we can support SuSe 9.2.
> >
> >Hmm, well, GoG has some newer dependencies.. But it shouldn't be 2.8; 2.6
> >maybe, 2.4 at best.. Depends on which version system you're using.
>
> Current dependencies in CVS are:
>
> goffice_reqs="
> glib-2.0 >= 2.6.4
> gobject-2.0 >= 2.6.4
> gmodule-2.0 >= 2.6.4
> libgsf-1 >= 1.11.2
> libxml-2.0 >= 2.4.12
> pango >= 1.8.1
> pangoft2 >= 1.8.1
> "
> goffice_gtk_reqs="
> gtk+-2.0 >= 2.6.0
> libglade-2.0 >= 2.3.6
> libgnomeprint-2.2 >= 2.8.2
> libart-2.0 >= 2.3.11
> "
> goffice_gnome_reqs="
> gconf-2.0
> libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.0.0
> libgsf-gnome-1 >= 1.11.2
> "
Right -- these deps are "too new" for us to use. In particular, we'd miss RHEL4
using these deps. So we can't use that library for our first release.
> Emmanuel.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list