Modules and GnuCash (was: MacIntel trunk build failure)

[Josh Sled]

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 12:43 -0500, Peter McAlpine wrote:
> And so I pose this question: is GnuCash to have a modular design or
> not? If yes, then the modules need to be ripped apart and made to use
> a strict interface. If no, then the GNCModule code should be ripped
> out and everything should (go back?) to being treated as a library.

No, we don't need runtime loadable {G,GNC}Modules.  We should just have
a collection of shared libraries.  Features and apps are configured at
buildtime, not runtime.

We might want to change that in the future, but we'd probably do it
differently.  We'll win much more than we lose by removing the GNCModule
stuff.

-- 
...jsled
http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled;b=asynchronous.org;echo ${a}@${b}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20070215/7a0990ad/attachment.bin