time_t

[Graham Leggett]

Nathan Buchanan wrote:

> I guess the real question is - can we wait a couple years for a 64 bit
> time_t? Probably, I think.

Are there any systems in wide use that aren't yet 64 bit time_t? I was 
under the impression that OSes had already changed.

A quick look under MacOSX Leopard shows time_t is a long, and on RHEL5 
it is a long int.

Regards,
Graham
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3287 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20080715/8a11b5c4/attachment.bin