Date-fix (was: GnuCash XML spec)

[John Ralls]

On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:22 PM, John Ralls <jralls at ceridwen.us> wrote:

> 
> On Nov 9, 2012, at 12:41 PM, "Derek Atkins" <derek at ihtfp.com> wrote:
> 
>> John,
>> 
>> On Fri, November 9, 2012 2:47 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>>> 
>>> Any objections to converting all Timespecs to time_t64? (I decided that
>>> time_t64 is clearer than gnc_time_t.)
>> 
>> As opposed to time64_t?
> 
> Maybe. There's int64_t in sys/types.h, but I don't know where (or if) that's specified anywhere. But it's intuitively obvious that int64 means "64-bit integer". Is time64 equally intuitive? 
> 
> OTOH, GLib sticks 64 (or 8, 16, or 32) on the end of base types (e.g. gint64), and time_t is sort-of a base type.
> 
> Shrug. Doesn't really matter, a single run of find can switch from one to the other.

What if I split the difference and use "time64"?

Regards,
John Ralls