Version Numbering

[John Ralls]

> On May 30, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Chris Good <chris.good at ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> 
> Hi John & Geert,
> 
> Everybody has had a chance to express their opinion now.
> There doesn't seem to be a consensus on what the version number segments
> should be called in the community as a whole.
> There has been a lot of good information emerge that I would like to
> document in to the Development Process wiki section.
> 
> If you can both agree on a naming scheme, I think we should go with whatever
> you both think.
> How about Geert's latest suggestion: fundamental.major.bugfix ?
> 
> Or should I just document them as FirstSegment.SecondSegment.ThirdSegment?

Well, I still don’t care much for “fundamental”, but it’s better than anything else we’ve come up with so let’s go with it.

Regards,
John Ralls