rfc or suggestion--save backups function for gnucash
jdebert
jdebert at garlic.com
Tue Jul 20 05:48:52 EDT 2004
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 July 2004 9:49, jdebert wrote:
>
>>I think gnucash could benefit from a function to (optionally) save
>>backup copies of an account file before and after opening.
>
>
> Have you found GnuCash file access to be unreliable? Why a backup every single
> time - are you archiving these or just letting the latest one overwrite the
> previous? WHY? I backup all ~/ data to CDR but I've never needed to recover a
> GnuCash file from a backup copy, even after changing distro, upgrading
> GnuCash, tinkering with the code, using CVS, nothing. I've been rescued by a
> backup many, many times for other programs but never for GnuCash.
>
That does not seem to imply any problem with gnucash: If gnucash were
unreliable then backups would also be unreliable and therefore useless.
Some distros seem to be making for problems, though. I lost my gnucash
data files to a distro defect recently. Whatever it did also trashed the
gnucash-generated backups and logs on writing them. Maybe some extra
backup functions for gnucash might help overcome system defects.
>
>>The function would feature three methods: "do not make backups", "make
>>backups" and "exec an external app or script to make backups".
>
>
> There should be some explanation about why this is necessary - it could give
> the unjustified impression that GnuCash is unreliable.
>
same reasoning as above,
>
>>Currently I use a shell wrapper to make backups before and after running
>>gnucash.
>
>
> Why?
They go to a different filesystem, for one, and add redundancy to
increase the likelihood that a usable copy exists somewhere.
>
>
>>Putting this feature into gnucash may make it more flexible and
>>helpful to ordinary users who would not be able to make or install
>>wrappers.
>
>
> You haven't explained why this would be necessary.
Only to try to overcome system defects that may trash files.
>
>
>>Does this seem like something useful?
>
>
> Not to me.
> :-)
>
>
Probably not...
Nevermind.
Too tired, doing too many things at once. forgot about the gnucash
backups already produced. And would not help, anyway, since a system
problem trashing the data files would also too likely affect all the
backups as well. The wrapper saving backups before and after running
gnucash would be a better solution.
Adding this to gnucash would really be more trouble than it's worth.
=-=
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list