Opening balance correction.
tim at thewunders.org
Sat Dec 15 13:28:00 EST 2007
On Saturday 15 December 2007 01:01:43 pm jim wrote:
> Thanks Andrew for the response. I may have misled everyone by using the
> term opening balance. The part that is incorrect is in the reconcile
> screen and is the "starting balance". I have checked repeatedly all
> entries for the year in question and all are correct. The difference
> must have occurred sometime during this past year when I did a
> reconciliation and unknowingly entered an incorrect starting balance.
> This makes all subsequent reconciliations to not reconcile as far as I
> have been able to determine. I suppose the only solution is to re-enter
> all the transactions without reconciling any of the periods, then doing
> a reconciliation at the end. Shouldn't take but about two, may three
Why not reconcile from what it says is the starting amount to what the
starting amount should be? Won't that bring you back in line when you next
Fedora Core release 6 (Zod), Linux 220.127.116.11-72.fc6
KDE: 3.5.8-1.fc6 Fedora
13:25:01 up 6 days, 14:55, 3 users, load average: 2.58, 1.35, 1.11
"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts" John Wooden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/attachments/20071215/8bb0f184/attachment.bin
More information about the gnucash-user