Debit a 'Checking Account' Only

[Paul Schwartz]

Alex is correct about the account balance, but the transactions would still be 
there. Certainly it would be better to change each expense transaction. Another 
comment for the original poster is that proper terminology is that the Checking 
Account would be Credited as originally the expense accounts were probably 
Debited.

HTH

Paul



----- Original Message ----
> From: Alex Hill <alex_hill at arach.net.au>
> To: b4wt <miztiik+gnucash at gmail.com>; gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 6:36:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Debit a 'Checking Account' Only
> 
> Would a transfer from Checking Account to Imbalance not do the trick, or am I  
>missing something in the question? After the transfer Checking Account should  
>reflect the cost of the imbalanced transactions and Imbalance should be zeroed  
>out.
> 
> Alex
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "b4wt" <miztiik+gnucash at gmail.com>
> To: <gnucash-user at gnucash.org>
> Sent:  Monday, July 19, 2010 6:05 PM
> Subject: Debit a 'Checking Account'  Only
> 
> 
> > I have created a expenses account and made lot of entires  with "Imbalance"
> > as the debit account [ Probably another newbie mistake  ]. Now i want all
> > these entries to be debited from another account say  'Checking Account'
> > 
> > Is there any simpler way of doing this  rather than manually modifying each
> > transaction, Say all transactions  under this account debit from 'Checking
> > Account'
> >  _______________________________________________
> > gnucash-user mailing  list
> > gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> >  -----
> > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> > You  can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing  list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please  remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using  Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>