building from source.

[John Ralls]

On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Geert Janssens <janssens-geert at telenet.be> wrote:
> 
> See, if you install compat-guile18-devel, configure will detect guile 
> 1.8 on your system, but the guile binary for 1.8 is called guile1.8. But 
> gnucash only checks for "guile", which is the name of the guile 2.0 
> binary. So in this setup, you end up with CFLAGS and LDFLAGS for guile 
> 1.8, but with the guile executable for guile 2.0.

We'd prefer Guile 2.0 if it's available, right? Should we invert the test so that we look
for Guile 2.0 first and fallback to Guile 1.8?

Regards,
John Ralls