David Merrill <dmerrill@lupercalia.net> writes: > It really *is* just a rational number expressed as integer numerator > over integer denominator. Right. The fact that we'll probably have to represent it with two columns in a database is just an artifact of the fact that SQL doesn't have RATIONAL_64 as a type. :> -- Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930