Support for casual users (was: Re: client-server)
David Merrill
dmerrill@lupercalia.net
Fri, 29 Dec 2000 08:52:34 -0500
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:12:07PM +1100, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> Eugene Tyurin writes:
> >
> <snip>
> > Is this really something a casual user who wants to balance his
> > checkbook and know how much he spends on beer can bear?
>
> Unless it's totally transparent to them, no. Basically, it may be
> that GnuCash, in the long term, has to split into two seperate products
> (still sharing large amounts of code and developers), one aimed at
> business users and supporting database backends and such complexities,
> and one aimed at home users and not involving them.
>
> Rest assured none of us wants to disenfranchise the single home user.
I know that you mean this sincerely. But we really do need to define
the overall goal/scope of the project. Much has been implied but
fairly little has been actually laid out.
1. Are we going to continue support for the local file store?
2. Are we going to attempt to be an enterprise system?
3. Are we going to attempt to be a small business accounting package?
4. How scalable do we really need to be?
5. How can we carefully modularize the application so that we fit the
needs of both home and business users without making as many
"compromises"?
I would love to see a Free enterprise package, but I don't see how
gnucash can be both that and a home user package at the same time. My
vote, and I think yours as well(?), is to always put the home and
small business user first. Hopefully, gnue will fill the high end.
--
Dr. David C. Merrill http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project dmerrill@lupercalia.net
Collection Editor & Coordinator http://www.linuxdoc.org
Finger me for my public key
We are the flow, and we are the ebb.
We are the weavers, we are the web.