Tools for the HTML manuals

[Robert Graham Merkel]

Christopher Browne writes:
 > Should we have HTML, or SGML in the source tree? is the question.
 > 
 > - If both, then there is the risk that someone may modify the HTML,
 > and then watch it get overwritten the next time someone upstream runs
 > "make," and builds fresh HTML.
 > 
 > - If only SGML, then that forces anyone that gets a CVS archive
 > to add yet another component to those that they install.
 > 

And the people who will scream most loudly are those who are trying to
build gnucash on anything other than Linux or *BSD, as they will
probably have to build those components themselves.

While I would prefer to have only SGML in the source tree, I suspect
we may have to live with both.  Dave can comment when he gets back.

 > I'm liable to generate something complex enough to be worth
 > looking at closely, but won't be doing anything _bizarrely_
 > complex.

Cool, we'll save that for if and when we corbify the engine . . . 

------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Merkel	                           rgmerk@mira.net

------------------------------------------------------------