g-wrap and glib container types...

[Robert Graham Merkel]

James LewisMoss writes:
 > >>>>> On 07 Nov 2000 13:55:47 -0600, Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> said:

 > The only thing that concerns me about this is you are introducing into
 > scheme an easy way to cause a segfault.  Maybe implement it this way
 > in the short term because it's the easiest and lets us get onto other
 > more important things quickly, but this is a bad long term solution
 > imo.

g-wrap already gives you more than enough opportunities to cause
segfaults from scheme.  That's *always* been the case, and I can't see
how you could design a tool like g-wrap that didn't provide that
possibility.  

I would be *very happy* if someone could prove me wrong.  I hate
segfaults too :)

------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Merkel	                           rgmerk@mira.net

------------------------------------------------------------