How many people are using guile 1.3 (not 1.3.4) and can't easily switch?
Peter C. Norton
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:48:35 -0700
Yeah, 1.3 is a pretty lackluster guile. And that's saying something :)
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 04:08:31PM +0000, Richard -Gilligan- Uschold wrote:
> Rob Browning wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, the latest version of g-wrap works fine with
> > guile 1.3.4 and guile 1.4 on my system(s).
> > Since it would be somewhat difficult/time-consuming for me to install
> > guile-1.3 and add backward compatibility and test g-wrap, I'm trying
> > to figure out if it would be unreasonable to just require guile 1.3.4
> > or newer and add a test to the g-wrap configure process.
> > Since I don't have much experience with the other distributions, I was
> > hoping people could give me an idea of where they are with respect to
> > guile packaging. Also, please let me know if my assertion about 1.3.4
> > and 1.4 being OK is wrong.
> > Thanks
> > --
> > Rob Browning <email@example.com> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnucash-devel mailing list
> > firstname.lastname@example.org
> > http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
> I'm using guile 1.3, only because the rpm I downloaded for 1.4.4 required
> it. I thought it odd that it wasn't using a more recent version. I'll
> upgrade to 1.4.7 to see if that solves the problem.
> Gilligan | __o .oooO
> /| _ \<,_ ( )
> /p|\ (_)/ (_) \ ( Oooo.
> / | \ ------------ \_) ( )
> ======== ) /
> ======== email@example.com (_/
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ firstname.lastname@example.org
The 5 year plan:
In five years we'll make up another plan.
Or just re-use this one.