Problems with transaction cut/paste

[Dave Peticolas]

"Phillip Shelton" writes:
> > > I have a couple of problems to report with 1.4.2.  These
> > > may have been
> > > fixed already in 1.5.1?
> > >
> > >   1. The pasted transaction had lost both the date and the
> > >      ID number. Since I cut instead of copy, I didn't know what the
> > >      invoice no. and date were any more.  So I had to look them up in >
> >      the old paperwork and re-enter that data.
> >
> > I had originally thought that copying a transaction shouldn't
> > use the old date or id number, since it's a 'new' transaction.
> > But that's probably too confusing. I'll change it to keep the
> > date and number, too.
> 
> If you are copying then perhaps you do not want the old date or ID but if
> you cut then you probably do. Is it possible to flag the difference?

Yes, we may need to do that. It's a bit confusing since cut
is generally equivalent to "paste, delete", but maybe it's
unavoidable.

dave