currency clarification
Christian Stimming
stimming@uclink.berkeley.edu
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:29:22 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In a recent chat with goonie, it appeared to me that our consensus on the
currency/commodity in the account/transaction/split structures is still
unclear to most developers. Therefore I cleaned up all the respective
comments in the header files, see attached patch. Additionally, I
recovered grib's mail from last October which is the best summary of our
new policy. I think src/doc/currencies.txt is a good place for that.
BUT I have a request. Each split will store two amounts, value and
damount[1]. The function to get those two amounts are xaccSplitGetValue
and xaccSplitGetShareAmount (for damount). I *don't like* the latter name!
Since the latter function will be getting used in a lot of places which
don't relate to what we know as shares at all, I would rather like to have
it renamed to SplitGetDAmount (referring to the fieldname) or just
SplitGetAmount. What do people think?
Christian
[1] 'value' is the amount of the transaction balancing commodity (i.e.
currency) involved, 'damount' is the amount of the account's commodity
(formerly known as 'security') involved.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBOpX1M2XAi+BfhivFAQG96wQAtMc077c7TdRKi9KwAQy9f4LmITx4JDvA
9PHZTQeXasC3CR1bEXSO0BJBumfyEhTBg+hTD91mc+pGQdSj7god6tStjA+8Gmx8
MFS2LXSjvb67XgGi3dcW53cezxVqOofqxRBcdYN/Acd9BH8EKPGgn56vlIAPToRf
W0UZECKtYDo=
=sw4G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----