Dependency hell redux

[Phillip J Shelton]

I have just read Paul Lussier's post of the 18 june 2001 Re: gnucash
dependencies criticized.

(I am never sure which way to read my posts.  Do I start with the latest and
work back or do I start with the earlest and work forward?)

And I will now sit down in my corner as the comment I haven't made should
more probably be made at Gnome not Gnucash.

Phillip J Shelton wrote:

> Rob Walker wrote:
>
> > cbbrowne> Both options provide a nice big "blech!"
> >
> > yes, it sucks, but the users are then able to run gnucash.  It may be
> > 75 to 100 Megs of sucks, but it seems like gnucash needs that many
> > megs of libraries and whatnot.
>
> <jumping up and down>
> May I make a comment with my tongue stuck so firmly in my cheek that when
> I close my mouth I have bitten it off at the root????  Please, plesae??
> <jumping up and down/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel@lists.gnumatic.com
> http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel