Last check number problem (cvs version)

David Hampton hampton@employees.org
26 Feb 2002 08:42:20 -0800


--=-rSATxeL2a620lRqS+dZH
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 02:23, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> That does sound like reversed logic to me. Unless you can think
> of a reason not to just reverse it, I would go ahead and submit
> that patch.

O.K.  I'll do that tonight.

David


--=-rSATxeL2a620lRqS+dZH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA8e7rslSwHWMdNRQQRAmSMAKC+gp8PSGCIZDjs7dz4Q0DYzjoW4ACg4WdT
ohc0m5j0rCCpNz1NtXq9B+8=
=8CBF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-rSATxeL2a620lRqS+dZH--