Rik Harris <rik@kawaja.net> writes:
> OK, I'll just leave them there for the moment. I had marked them as
> inactive but, as you say, it didn't really achieve much...
Yea, I need to figure out the best way to deal with "inactive"
objects. In particular, I need a way to default to not showing the
inactives but allow the user to search for them.. In particular, if I
add a query term of "active == TRUE" and you later add an "active ==
FALSE", it will find nothing (because nothing will match active ==
TRUE AND active == FALSE). So it's a bit more complicated.
Suggestions are certainly welcome.
> > Feel free to file an RFE, but don't expect this to be fixed as quickly
> > as other bugs of yours that I've fixed recently ;)
>
> That's fair enough. I'll probably file a low-priority RFE.
Or an Enhancement.. ;)
Thanks,
> thanks,
> rik.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warlord@MIT.EDU PGP key available