Bug Triage (was Re: scheduled transactions make bad transactions with 1.8.9 ?)

Steve Romanow slestak at cavtel.net
Wed Jun 23 09:47:47 EDT 2004

On Wed, June 23, 2004 9:29 am, Derek Atkins said:
> Right now we don't have a good process in place for marking bugs
> as "reproducible".  We do use the NEEDINFO to mark a bug as,
> well, need more info. :)
> I suppose that, once you confirm a bug you can change it from UNCO ->
> NEW to confirm it.
> If you need bits I'm sure that Wilddev can help.
> -derek
> "Steve Romanow" <slestak at cavtel.net> writes:
>> I would like to help as well.  How can we id bugs that are in need of
>> this
>> work?  Just entries with no reproduce info, or do you want verification
>> of
>> supplied reproduce info?
>> Volker, we should mark them when we start so we dont duplicate effort.
Would you prefer we start with oldest or newest unconfirmed bugs.  Maybe
each of us should start from different end.

More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list