CLI undo edit?

Benoit Grégoire bock at step.polymtl.ca
Tue Aug 9 11:47:45 EDT 2005


On August 9, 2005 04:10 am, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Neil Williams <linux at codehelp.co.uk> writes:
> > On Monday 08 August 2005 9:47 am, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >> I presume by "retained" you mean "in core" and not "in storage"...
> >
> > Yes, the list itself would be part of the QofBook struct and
> > accessed via an API exposed via qofbook.h - the undo list itself
> > could be stored in a similar manner to the current logs if that was
> > useful. Depends on the SQL backend - if we're all using immediate
> > commit in SQL then would there be any need for the logs at all?
>
> IMHO, no.
>
> Also keep in mind that the logs are not complete and don't store
> enough information.  It would be much better if QOF had an in-core
> "log" that it could use instead of depending on the existing file-log
> interface.  Personally I'd like to rip out the file logs...  They
> cause way too many problems.  :(

We should rip them out in the head branch...


-- 
Benoit Grégoire, http://benoitg.coeus.ca/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20050809/16811354/attachment.bin


More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list