Automake, Schmautomake

Neil Williams linux at codehelp.co.uk
Fri Sep 16 13:09:11 EDT 2005


On Friday 16 September 2005 5:32 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Neil Williams <linux at codehelp.co.uk>:
> > On Friday 02 September 2005 10:27 pm, David Hampton wrote:
> >> Log Message:
> >> -----------
> >> Automake doesn't cause warnings in lib/goffice any more, so remove
> >> the message telling the user to ignore them.
> >>
> > The underlying changes in the dependencies of goffice mean that this is
> > not true for Debian unstable and these changes will trickle down into
> > other distributions in time.
>
> I'll just note that there is a difference between automake errors and
> compilation errors.

True.

> You're getting compilation errors.  This particular 
> log message was specifically about automake errors.  Please be more consise
> ;)

:-)

The thing is, of course, in order to fix the compilation errors I'm having to 
modify CFLAGS which then re-generates the automake errors!!!

> It's a known issue that libgoffice doesn't build cleanly on gcc4.  I'd
> recommend
> you stop using gcc4 :)

There is some logic in my madness. Honest.
;-)

-- 

Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20050916/b0bf05ec/attachment.bin


More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list