About "Re: Updated DDL for SQL backend"

[Motin]

Any other than me that got 15.000 copies of this mail? I think 1 would 
be enough :S

/Fredrik

Derek Atkins wrote:
> Josh Sled <jsled at asynchronous.org> writes:
>
>   
>> There's a deeper modeling issue with SXes. We use a seperate, parallel
>> AccountGroup to store template transaction data, in which Accounts are
>> named as the string representation of the SXes GUID, and contain
>> Transactions with Splits which have their *real* Accounts, as well as
>> the credit and debit cell text formulae, in KVP frames.
>>     
>
> I know David was working to re-model the AccountGroup...
>
>   
>> I don't see a reason to model this differently in the DB than in the
>> object model.  Though we might want to change the object model.
>>
>>
>> Also, in the DDL, SXes still have an sx_id, though as QOF entities they
>> are GUID-posessing objects, and thus should follow the pattern of those.
>>     
>
> How closely should the DB Schema map to the QOF object model?
>
> -derek
>
>