GObject in GC implementation Plan

David Hampton gnucash at love2code.net
Thu Apr 12 15:32:41 EDT 2007


On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 14:06 -0500, Daniel Espinosa wrote:

> I can understand why you feel that; the reason is that I don't think
> that convert QOF to GObject will be a good idea because its
> implementation doesn't allow it, you'll never have a full GObject
> system if you insist to use QOF.

You keep making that statement, but you haven't explained what you mean
by it.  Why can't we eventually migrate to a full GObject, what will be
missing, and what will that mean to the project?  Please either explain
yourself, or stop spreading what (at this point) I can only call FUD.

David




More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list