GnuCash 2.1.2 directions

[Wm Stewart]

I will file this as a new item once I find out where.  Please note again
this is not a duplicate of the known issue you reference -- that issue does
not refer to surreptitious external IP connection as a requirement for
operation of the application.

Christian Stimming wrote:
> If you want to discuss a bugzilla item, please keep this discussion on
> bugzilla. This is what this is for.
> 
> Quoting Wm Stewart <wstewart at livinginternet.com>:
>> Can someone explain why this bug has been closed, ignored?  I honestly
>> thought after my first notification of surreptitious external IP
>> connection
>> three months ago that this would have been considered seriously by the
>> development team.  Rather disillusioning - not sure why I would report
>> bugs
>> in the future if they are going to be treated like this...
>>
>>    http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407458#c14
>>    Please advise (a) why would you close a bug that indicates something
> 
> 1. You added your comments to the wrong bug: The initial report is about
> the gconf-editor program, not gnucash. And I already explained this in
> comment 10 but you didn't react on this.
> 
> 2. The data that has been provided so far indicates to me this is a
> DUPLICATE of a known issue,
> http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Windows#GConf.2FORBit_COMM_FAILURE , and
> this is being discussed in other bugzilla items already. Hence, this bug
> must be closed to avoid duplicated discussions.
> 
> 3. If you think you have discovered a bug that is not yet covered by the
> bug numbers mentioned in that wiki page, please file this as a *new*
> item. Thanks.
> 
> Christian
>