Using gnome-doc-utils for help files

[Josh Sled]

Pierre-Antoine Lacaze <pa.lacaze at laposte.net> writes:
> I'm beginning the French translation of Gnucash's help, and have been
> suggested that it would be a good move to look into converting
> gnucash-help to gnome-doc-utils [1]. g-d-u is supposedly the preferred
> way for documentation handling, and make use of po files.
>
> I more or less ported it already, and would like to know if there is a
> compelling reason not to move over.
>
> I fear myself with po files the lack of flexibility required in highly
> technical, country-specific documentation.

For a bit more color, you and I discussed this on IRC [1], though the other
day you came back and seemed to indicate that it didn't work out so well
[2].  So, is that a compelling reason to not move over?

In any case, can you please post a patch against the gnucash-docs sources
that "implements" gnome-doc-utils?

[1] http://lists.gnucash.org/logs/2007-07-02.html#T16:29:51
[2] http://lists.gnucash.org/logs/2007-07-03.html#T14:35:27

-- 
...jsled
http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo ${a}@${b}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20070705/1300ab10/attachment-0001.bin