QIF doc pages

[Charles Day]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Andreas Köhler <andi5.py at gmx.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 28.02.2008, 10:56 -0800 schrieb Charles Day:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Derek Atkins <warlord at mit.edu> wrote:
> >         Hi,
> >
> >         "Charles Day" <cedayiv at gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >         > I have set the svn:ignore property on the schemas directory,
> >         using the same
> >         > value from its parent (src/import-export/qif-import).
> >          However, I don't have
> >         > any .svn/config to my knowledge ("find" couldn't locate
> >         one). I see that files
> >         > in the parent directory have an svn:keywords property,
> >         whereas the two new
> >         > files in the schemas directory don't. What is a
> >         "good" .svn/config and where
> >         > do I get one? And do I need to add an svn:keywords property
> >         to the two new
> >         > files?
> >
> >
> >         Sorry, it's ~/.subversion/config
> >
> > It turns out that on Windows XP, the config file must be located in %
> > APPDATA%\Subversion (in my case, the file is C:\Documents and Settings
> > \Charles\Application Data\Subversion\config)
> >
> >
> >         I've attached mine.  It really only affects you when you "add"
> >         files.
> >         Maybe we should link to this from the wiki?
> >
> > Thanks for the attachment - that's what I needed and I'm now getting
> > properties automatically when I do an "svn add".
> >
> > I think that being able to retrieve this information from the wiki
> > would be a good idea. In addition, perhaps the Windows "install.sh"
> > script that installs SVN automatically could also install this default
> > "config" at the same time.
>
> Do not you think that we should strip off the globs that do not concern
> a typical gnucash source tree from the config file first?  But again,
> hey, feel free to improve install.sh :-)
>

I haven't looked at that file in detail, and I'm definitely the wrong person
to judge its content. I was just asking whether it sounds like a good idea
in principle. -Charles

After rereading README.patches, I wonder whether we would like to apply
> the attached patch as well.
>
> -- andi5
>
>