GNUCash translation status

[warlord at MIT.EDU]

I have no objection to either using l10n.gnome.org or re-adding
POTFILES.in to SVN.  Even though POTFILES.in is generated every time,
I suspect that it wouldn't change from run to run, so we should be fine.
Worst case I think we could just run a 'sort' to make sure it gives
consistent output every time.  So I have no objection.

-derek

Quoting Claude Paroz <claude at 2xlibre.net>:

> Hi,
>
> Seeing that you had some problems in integrating translation status of
> GNUCash in the Translation project, I'd like to propose you to integrate
> http://l10n.gnome.org to track translation status of GNUCash.
>
> I've already discussed this matter with Christian Stimming, and the main
> drawback we currently see is the necessity to have POTFILES.in committed
> in the SVN, like we do for all other GNOME apps, unless intltool-update
> fails.
>
> The Damned Lies app that powers up the l10n.gnome.org website allows to
> have almost real-time status from SVN (HEAD or branches).
> See e.g. http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gedit
> Translators only need to download the already merged po files (or pot
> file for a fresh new language) to begin complete a translation. It's
> very straightforward, even for non-technical people.
> We could then add a note specific to GNUCash where to submit files
> (bugzilla or email address).
>
> Moreover, this could also boost GNUCash translations, taking advantage
> of GNOME translation team's momentum.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Claude
> --
> www.2xlibre.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
>