libofx in Debian

Christian Stimming stimming at tuhh.de
Tue Jan 15 03:50:52 EST 2008


Am Montag, 14. Januar 2008 16:55 schrieb Thomas Bushnell BSG:
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 15:52 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> > In fact, after thinking about it for a while, your idea with packaging
> > libofx without the OFX DTDs sounds even worse for me. I mean, the
> > whole point of libofx is processing OFX. Shipping it without that
> > feature is like shipping a lib-foo-print package without printing
> > functionality. Iff you decide to do this, you should at least rename
> > it into something like libofx-noofx or similar. But with the name
> > "libofx" you should package only something that can actually process
> > OFX data.
>
> Well, the OFC DTD is still there.  That's perhaps not very important?

No, it is not very important.

Christian


More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list