GDA: Status

[Leigh Morresi]

One common pitfall i have noticed in many gnome applications is that
they can be dragged down in the future by dependancies on other gnome
libraries - that for whatever reason seem to loose momentum and drop
into obscurity.

I would advise against using libgda unless you are saving *gnome
specific* or *desktop specific* information, there are many other ways
to skin this cat that are far more future-proof and have a more active
user/developer base than libgda

my two cents :)


On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 22:16 -0400, Albert Lash wrote:
> Phil, you're the one doing the work on this, so I support your
> decision to use either v3 or v4.
> 
> Regarding dropping or pulling gda into the tree, I think that while
> its not ready for prime time, I would expect libgda to be well
> supported over the long run.
> 
> While I'm not proficient with libgda or C, I am familiar with
> databases so I'd be happy to assist if I can, even if it is testing
> new code.
> 
> Albert
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
-- 
Leigh Morresi
+61401883741
dgtlmoon at gmail.com
http://dgtlmoon.com
skype: dgtlmoon