c.shoemaker at cox.net
Tue Aug 4 08:53:55 EDT 2009
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:43:32PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 12:02:07PM -0400, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> > The budget report is my current itch, so I've been upgrading it.
> I'd like to see the budget reporting improved as much as anyone else, and I'm
> glad that you are looking at it. However, the semantics of budget data have not
> been clearly established, as I highlighted in a comment on bug #570895:
> My current understanding of budget numbers is that if A and B are expense
> accounts and B is a child account of A and both A and B have numbers entered
> for a given period in the budget, the total expenses for that period is
> A[period] + B[period]. In other words, A[period] doesn't *override*
> B[period]. This is how things are handled in BIS, anyway. I don't think the
> correct behavior is documented anywhere. This may be part of a larger design
> discussion, so feel free to move it to the ML if you think it is appropriate.
> I'd really like to see some agreement on this before the budget reports get much
What you describe is correct. It's important to remember that:
a. A and B may use different currencies.
b. Budget values for an account are always in the same currency as the account.
c. There *may* be no reasonable way to convert from one currency to the other.
More information about the gnucash-devel