Proposal for Save As.../Open dialog
janssens-geert at telenet.be
Fri Dec 11 15:31:09 EST 2009
On Friday 11 December 2009, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Freitag, 11. Dezember 2009 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> > I think it will be alright in this case, because:
> > * It works ok, I have tested that.
> > * The dialog has been reworked fairly intensively, so even if it was
> > written in glade-2 format, a diff with the original dialog would
> > essentially show the new file. I mean the svn diff history would be
> > equally meaningless if the new glade file was still in glade-2 format as
> > it is now.
> Yes, I agree - I wouldn't expect a "more readable" svn diff result even in
> However, there was the question of backward compatibility of the glade-3
> files. Is our minimum libglade version sufficient for using the glade-3
> files? This might very well be the case, but I don't know. If this question
> can be answered with yes, of course you can commit glade-3 files right away
> already now.
Glade 3.6.2 allows to set the maximum Gtk+ version in the preferences. I had
set it to 2.10 prior to making modifications. This should guarantee that the
code generated is compatible with Gtk+ 2.10 and above.
I believe 2.10 was more or less agreed upon as the minimum version (given that
this is the version used in RHEL 5). There was never a formal confirmation of
this, though. Perhaps this is a good time to decide on this ?
If 2.10 is still too recent, glade can also generate code compatible with 2.8.
More information about the gnucash-devel