Future of Gnucash

Phil Longstaff plongstaff at rogers.com
Tue Dec 28 11:55:08 EST 2010


On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 08:50 -0800, John Ralls wrote:

> I'd much prefer C++ to GObjects, but either is better than the GObjects without the G that you used for the dbi/sql backend. We can make the transition gradually, as C++ and C inter-operate nicely.

Yeah.  That just grew.  c++ would have been great, and gobjects seemed
too heavy and cumbersome.

Phil



More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list