SQL backend performance
janssens-geert at telenet.be
Tue Feb 23 11:40:05 EST 2010
On Tuesday 23 February 2010, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Geert Janssens
> > Your assumptions on how things work are correct.
> > And I noticed this performance decrease as well.
> > There is one difference between the xml and the sql backends that may
> > influence this (at least in part): the sql backend writes lots of debug
> > information to gnucash.trace at present. I don't know how much impact
> > this has, I haven't tested without debug information, but if we disable
> > the debug information before the 2.4 release, it will surely narrow the
> > gap.
> I'm seeing trace files on the order of .5 Mb. As I mentioned earlier,
> saving my xml file takes about 2 seconds. It's about 2.5 Mb (over 20
> Mb uncompressed) and the 2 seconds includes the time to compress it.
> Writing the trace file is not nearly as hard a job and the periodic
> writes should be to the buffer cache on any reasonable machine. So
> I'll guess (again) that the gap-narrowing won't amount to much. I hope
> I'm wrong :-)
I think true measurements will be the only way to find out what causes delays
where. But it's clear there's still room for performance improvements.
More information about the gnucash-devel