Is there anything I should know to replace GnomeDruid with GtkAssistant?

[Greg Troxel]

Christian Stimming <stimming at tuhh.de> writes:

> thanks for this research. To me, this sounds like it would require
> significant efforts to get back into a source code state that compiles
> on CentOS 5.5. IMHO this effort gives only very little gain. Hence,
> IMHO we should acknowledge that our support of this distro has been
> dropped already, and hence we should increase our required gtk et al
> versions accordingly.

What I don't get is why people who are running these "long-term stable"
releases that intentionally have old versions of software expect to run
new versions of some other kinds of software.  I don't do anything
useful for gnucash, so there's no reason to listen to me, but why does
anybody care if the current gnucash version works on stable/old systems?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20100702/56cd47cc/attachment.bin>