Can I make this change ?
Derek Atkins
warlord at MIT.EDU
Wed Jun 2 10:51:51 EDT 2010
Geert Janssens <janssens-geert at telenet.be> writes:
> src/gnome/dialog-print-check.c contains this construct:
> #define ENUM_CHECK_ITEM_TYPE(_) \
> _(NONE,) \
[snip]
> However I'm not sure what these _() are doing around the parameters. I
> thought it had to do with translations, but none of these terms is in
> the po files so that doesn't seem to be it.
If you look at the #define, it defines ENUM_CHECK_ITEM_TYPE as a macro
that takes one argument, and the argument is labeled as an underscore.
So if you call ENUM_CHECK_ITEM_TYPE(foo) it will then result in:
foo(NONE,) ...
> Can anyone explain to me how to interpret this construct ? And even more
> importantly, if I can add the CHK_ prefix without unintended side-effects ?
Well, you could just change the construct from _ to something else, like
"expr". So you could do something like:
#define ENUM_CHECK_ITEM_TYPE(expr) \
expr(CHK_NONE,) \
...
HOWEVER, note that this will invalidate all existing check formats! So
it's a non-backwards-compatible interface format.
Is there some way we can get guile not to #include windows includes?
> Geert
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list