Build dependencies (was: Re: Request: require glib2 >= 2.12)

[Derek Atkins]

John Ralls <jralls at ceridwen.us> writes:

>> I think it's PROBABLY safe to remove these now.
>> 
>
> Hmm. That means that it would need to be thoroughly tested. Do the
> current tests provide sufficient coverage to make sure that without is
> OK? Alternatively, if I do a build against Guile-1.6.0 and the gnucash
> srfis aren't pulled in, is that good enough?

I think testing against 1.6.0 would be good enough.  I don't think the
rest of the tests are sufficient.

> Regards,
> John Ralls

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord at MIT.EDU                        PGP key available