RFC: Move business-core objects (back) into engine, including their serialization

[Geert Janssens]

On Saturday 27 March 2010, Christian Stimming wrote:
> For this reason I propose to move all code from business-core/ into
>  engine/, the code from business-core/xml/ into backend/xml, and from
>  business-core/sql into backend/sql. This will get us back to the point
>  where each single level of abstraction is also located in one single
>  location in our source code.
> 
> I don't think moving this code "upstream" inside our tree might cause any
> major problems, because any "downstream" dependencies will implicitly
>  continue to be fulfilled before and after the move.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christian
> 
> [1]
> http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2010-March/027718.html
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
> 
I am all for merging the business core objects into the engine. IMO this will 
make it easier to improve the integration of the business functions in the 
rest of GnuCash. It will also avoid having to fix things in two places (like 
the Japanese support in the register code, for example).

So, +1 as far as I'm concerned.

Geert