Druid -> Assistant in Docs

Yawar Amin yawar.amin at gmail.com
Fri Nov 5 07:58:05 EDT 2010


Hi All,

On 2010-11-05, at 06:58, Geert Janssens wrote:

> On Friday 5 November 2010, Mike Evans wrote:
>> Just a thought concerning the use of "druid" in the docs.  Earlier this
>> year It was discussed that the use of "druid" is deprecated in favour of
>> "assistant" in the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines 2.2.1.  It seems that
>> this had not made it into the docs.  Should we be replacing druid with
>> assistant in the docs?
>> 
>> Mike E
>> 
> Yes, I think we should do so.

I’ve created a bug [1] for this. Would anyone like to start work on it? Should be pretty simple (s/druid/assistant/g) with vim or similar….

Regards,

Yawar

[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634075

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20101105/4aa83be6/attachment.bin>


More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list