[PATCH] Assorted guile-related build fixes
tcreedon at easystreet.net
Tue Nov 8 12:18:05 EST 2011
not finding guile 1.8 is what I've observed - I can send debug info from an
strace of configure if desired
i have 2 systems one guiile 1.8 & one 2.0
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> Geert Janssens (janssens-geert at telenet.be) said:
> > On vrijdag 13 mei 2011, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > I was doing some testing with guile-2.0 and GnuCash, and encountered
> > > the need for the following fixes to make it build.
> > >
> > > (Note: it still doesn't *work*, but it at least builds for further
> > > testing.)
> > >
> > > Total changes:
> > > configure.ac | 14 ++++++++------
> > > src/import-export/aqbanking/Makefile.am | 1 +
> > > src/plugins/bi_import/Makefile.am | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gnucash-devel mailing list
> > > gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> > > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
> > Bill,
> > I just discovered this series of your patches in my mailbox, all covered
> > dust ;)
> > I'm under the impression they never got applied, right ?
> AFAIK, yes, although I've only really checked on the 2.4 branch.
> > Patch 2 is obsolete by now . I have made some other changes in the
> > so aqbanking and bi_import are no longer dependent on guile.
> > Patch 3 seems to make sense to me, I'll apply it shortly.
> > And regarding patch 1, I'm a bit confused. While working on the bug
> > below, Petr had written a patch very similar to your patch 2, yet it did
> > to work without applying patch 1. So your patch series suggests
> GUILE_INCS has
> > to be AC_SUBST before it can be included, but Petr's patch suggests
> > Is GUILE_INCS automatically substituted as part of the other macro's
> perhaps ?
> > I'm not that well versed in the autotools magic, so I prefer to ask
> Hah, neither am I. But looking at it, GUILE_INCS is in most of the
> Makefile.am files, so having an explicit substitute of it looks right. (The
> problem I remember having is it not finding guile correctly in
> /usr/include/guile/2.0/... which is where our test guile-2.0 packages were
> putting it).
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
More information about the gnucash-devel