Git Migration: github with svn access

[reubano]

Geert Janssens wrote
> 
> On 13-08-12 11:33, reubano wrote:
>> reubano wrote
>>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Derek Atkins <warlord@>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Reuben Cummings <reubano@> writes:
>>>>
>>>> Gnucash is following the Gnome patch submission practice. Gnome uses
>>>> git,
>>>> but not Github, and
>>>> doesn't use pull requests (which are actually designed to work through
>>>> email with, guess what, git
>>>> format-patch). I hope that even after we migrate to git we'll continue
>>>> with the same submission
>>>> practice.
>>> Is there any way both could work together? I've been reading a bit on
>>> the shortcomings of GitHub PRs [1] and am curious if any combination
>>> of git-request-pull [2], .patch URL [3], or patches-by-email [4] could
>>> work.
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/pull/17#issuecomment-5654674
>>> [2] http://git-scm.com/docs/git-request-pull
>>> [3] https://help.github.com/articles/using-pull-requests/ (Patch and
>>> Apply section)
>>> [4]
>>> http://alblue.bandlem.com/2011/12/git-tip-of-week-patches-by-email.html
>>>
>> I also just read about git-bz [1] (linked from the git wiki). It looks
>> promising as well. If there was some way to integrate OAuth it seems like
>> it
>> could even be ideal. Thoughts?
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Git-bz
>>
> Git-bz does look useful to me. People that want to submit patches 
> without having commit access can install this locally. At first sight it 
> doesn't seem to create new bugs if the patch you wish to publish is not 
> related to an existing bug. That may be a drawback.
> 
> Geert
> 

PyBugz[1] may do the trick 

[1] https://github.com/williamh/pybugz



--
View this message in context: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/Git-Migration-tp3996329p4656355.html
Sent from the GnuCash - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.