janssens-geert at telenet.be
Mon Sep 2 16:39:31 EDT 2013
On Monday 02 September 2013 19:48:48 Christian Stimming wrote:
> John Ralls <jralls at ceridwen.us> schrieb:
> >BZ has an enormous number of old target versions which makes for very
> >long lists when picking. I just modified all of the already-released
> >versions to sort to the bottom, but would anything bad happen if I
> >just deleted all previous releases? None of them are in use.
> In use by currently open bugs, you mean? Unfortunately bugzilla won't
> allow to delete old versions if there are closed bugs on them. I
> think that's why this list grows larger and larger...
> >Similarly I'd like to clean out the "version" list as well to include
> >only those versions which have bugs on them (which includes every
> >release from 2.2.0 on. I propose to consolidate all of the 2.0 and
> >2.3 releases into 2.0.x and 2.3.x respectively.
> >Any objections or concerns?
> All consolidation that is possible technically is fine with me.
More information about the gnucash-devel