design directory, ERM; was: Doxygen - is there a status?
geert.gnucash at kobaltwit.be
Mon Sep 15 13:13:14 EDT 2014
On Monday 15 September 2014 11:52:46 Derek Atkins wrote:
> Christian Stimming <christian at cstimming.de> writes:
> > In this particular case:
> > - John said very clear that the "higher level" documentation used to
> > be put in texinfo or doxygen and it didn't work, so we should put
> > it in the wiki. Nobody from the core developers objected, so please
> > take this as a decision and continue to work on "higher level"
> > design documentation only in the wiki. The texinfo files should be
> > deleted as soon as the last remaining useful bits are copied into
> > the wiki.
> > - The "lower level" i.e. the function-level documentation is in
> > doxygen and should stay there.
> > In case I've misunderstood any of the previous discussion, feel free
> > to comment or propose alternative solutions.
> This is my view as well.
> * High level designs in the Wiki
> * Low level designs (implementation info) and API docs in doxygen.
> And there can be links between.
Yes, looks good to me.
More information about the gnucash-devel