Internal Rate of Return in Advanced Portfolio
Wm...
tcnw81 at tarrcity.demon.co.uk
Fri Nov 13 17:12:45 EST 2015
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:36:59 <DJmrItHrCTRWFwbn at tarrcity.demon.co.uk>
Wm... <tcnw81 at tarrcity.demon.co.uk> wrote...
[ff to self]
>One idea I've had, possible for the weekend, is to compile gnc 2.2.7
>which I think the IRR scm was built for just to see what it does. [1]
>[1] at the moment I'm uncertain what the code in the IRR calc does. Is
>the Scheme code sufficiently clear to you to say what sums it is doing?
I installed 2.2.7 on a spare Win XP system and a test suggests the IRR
figures are reasonable.
I used the flow in
===
https://support.office.com/en-us/article/IRR-function-64925eaa-9988-495b-
b290-3ad0c163c1bc
===
rather than real data as my example and get
an IRR of 8.66% vs their 8.7% after 5 years
an IRR of -2.12% vs their -2.1% after 4 years
an IRR of -44.30% vs their -44.4% after 2 years (no user guesses)
which is close enough not to matter.
So, if ThomasA or anyone else has a real-ish (i.e. sensibly munged) set
of flows and an expected IRR that they'd like me to test (provide them
in a convenient format, please) I'll plug them in and see what comes
out.
Generally I'm now thinking this might be a worthwhile addition.
A thought: presuming the IRR is a good number should it be added to the
extant Advanced Portfolio report or should we make a new report? I'm
wondering if the Advanced Portfolio report isn't getting overloaded,
people are moaning about corner cases already, I think.
Observation: GnuCash 2.2.7 is noticeably faster than 2.6.9 and read my
existing files without a moan. Fun stuff!
--
Wm...
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list