Is informaltable OK in documentation
geert.gnucash at kobaltwit.be
Tue Oct 20 03:26:13 EDT 2015
On Monday 19 October 2015 21:02:23 John Ralls wrote:
> I thought it might. Like I said, you’ve done more testing than anyone
> else, so you found problems that have nothing to do with your setup.
> That means that if the informaltable is good enough, it’s good enough.
> Go ahead and make a PR.
> If you want to try and figure out how to get the mobi docs to look
> better, that’d be great. OTOH, we’ve had them up for a few years now
> and nobody’s complained, so maybe there are more important things to
> worry about.
> John Ralls
You can also just report it as a bug so it won't get lost and leave it for later/someone else.
Thanks for the thorough testing :)
More information about the gnucash-devel