Bug#876306: gnucash FTBFS: object class 'Transaction' has no property named 'bogus'

Micha Lenk micha at lenk.info
Thu Oct 5 14:34:36 EDT 2017


Hi Geert,

Thanks for fixing it that fast.

Micha

On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 03:49:31PM +0200, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Ok then, fix committed: https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/
> 42ac55e03a1a84739f4a5b7a247c31d91c0adc4a
> 
> So this will be fixed in the next stable release.
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out!
> 
> Geert
> 
> On donderdag 5 oktober 2017 03:23:00 CEST John Ralls wrote:
> > No, no use case in mind. I think I wrote those tests in a somewhat robotic
> > mode, trying to ensure complete test coverage for eventual refactoring of
> > the GObject code in the various engine modules. We’ve since decided to drop
> > GObject altogether and rewrite the classes in C++, so even if there was a
> > reason to test GObject behavior there won’t be one for long.
> > 
> > By all means delete the test.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > John Ralls
> > 
> > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 1:47 PM, Geert Janssens <geert.gnucash at kobaltwit.be>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I tend to agree with you and I have a patch waiting to be committed to
> > > solve this. Before I commit it though I would like to hear from John if
> > > he had a particular use case in mind when he chose to add this test.
> > > 
> > > Geert
> > > 
> > > On woensdag 27 september 2017 09:44:29 CEST Micha Lenk wrote:
> > >> Dear Gnucash developers,
> > >> 
> > >> The following bug has been reported in the Debian bug tracker as
> > >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876306
> > >> 
> > >> I agree that Gnucash tests shouldn't test the behavior of GObject.
> > >> Please consider to drop this test.
> > >> 
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Micha
> > >> 


More information about the gnucash-devel mailing list