[GNC-dev] Bugzilla Migration Status -- phase 2 -- please test
Derek Atkins
derek at ihtfp.com
Tue May 15 12:41:16 EDT 2018
John (et al),
On Tue, May 15, 2018 11:41 am, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 11:10 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>> Derek,
>>
>> There are 67 GnuCash bugs in Gnome with something in the See Also field:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?f1=see_also&list_id=310012&o1=regexp&order=Bug%20Number&product=GnuCash&query_format=advanced&v1=.%2B
>> <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?f1=see_also&list_id=310012&o1=regexp&order=Bug%20Number&product=GnuCash&query_format=advanced&v1=.+>
>>
>> The earliest one is https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402289
>> <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402289>, much later than the
>> ones you’ve imported.
>
> Ok. I'll add 402289 to my list.
I added 402289 to the list and imported it. However I noticed that it is
incorrectly using the See Also list. The see-also list is supposed to
only be used to reference external bugs (according to the documentation
[0]), but in this case it's referencing an INTERNAL bug. Specifically,
402289 is referencing https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548357 in
its see_also field.
According to the documentation internal references should use the
depends_on or blocks entries. Should I fix these along the way? If I
don't then we will leave dangling references after gnome BZ goes away. If
I do fix it, then I need some heuristic to know whether it should be a
depends_on or a blocks entry. Or maybe it should just be fixed in gnome
BZ first?
-derek
[0] https://bugzilla.gnucash.org/bugzilla/page.cgi?id=fields.html#see_also
--
Derek Atkins 617-623-3745
derek at ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com
Computer and Internet Security Consultant
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list