[GNC-dev] Test failure
John Ralls
jralls at ceridwen.us
Sun Jan 27 01:29:38 EST 2019
Stephen,
By all means learn about git bisect, it's an extremely useful troubleshooting tool. But don't exercise yourself too much about this particular failure, Chris and I know exactly what commit caused it and that the underlying cause is a bug in ICU (International Components for Unicode, http://site.icu-project.org/) versions 57-62.
I had thought that the problem was confined to 1969, but tonight got https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=797067 which makes me think that it's every year, so more testing needed.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On Jan 26, 2019, at 5:55 PM, Stephen M. Butler <kg7je at arrl.net> wrote:
>
> On 1/26/19 3:13 AM, Christopher Lam wrote:
>> Another experiment. Try prefix your build with "TZ=UTC " on current
>> maint.
>>
>> Eg if using ninja, it'll be "TZ=UTC ninja check"
>
>
> TZ=UTC dpkg- -rfakeroot -b -uc
>
> ....
>
> End testing: Jan 27 01:47 UTC
> + exit 2
> debian/rules:65: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed
> make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/steve/Projects/GnuCash/gnucash'
> debian/rules:24: recipe for target 'build' failed
> make: *** [build] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit
> status 2
>
> Same error -- Test 109 that fails.
>
>
> This is with the patches for 3.4. I verified before Sabbath that 3.4
> builds and passes the tests. Tried your test first thing this evening
> after git checkout maint and git pull. I am at 3.4-43-g84d1c3645 which
> builds but doesn't pass the tests. So, I could build turning off the
> test step.
>
> However, Friday I was learning more about git bisect to see if I could
> figure out which patch caused the tests to start failing. However, a
> couple of items got in the way: 1--time; 2--some commits don't build.
> That messed me up a bit. So, I may start over again with the bisect
> (just for my own edification) and see what happens. Maybe this time
> I'll do a git describe each time and take notes so I'll be a little more
> cognizant of what I'm learning. <<did that make sense>>
>
>
> --Steve (in the dark)
>
>>
>> On Fri., 25 Jan. 2019, 11:52 Stephen M. Butler <kg7je at arrl.net
>> <mailto:kg7je at arrl.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/24/19 7:36 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
>>> Revert is a git terminology, not a gnucash one. Welcome to version
>>> control.
>>
>> That's the manual to which I referred. It meant something else to my
>> mind when I first saw your post. But, after further thought, my
>> previous thought was faulty.
>>
>>
>> My first boss after college would draw a picture to describe the
>> difference between a bug and a feature.
>>
>> I can't draw so a word will have to do (at less than a thousand
>> words)!
>>
>> BUG: draw stick figure.
>>
>>
>> FEATURE: Add pants, tie, gloves, shoes and a top hat.
>>
>>
>> MORAL: A feature is a bug all dressed up and ready to go out.
>>
>>>
>>> Please remember this revert is reverting a buggy code with a
>> previous
>>> buggy code, so, cannot be consisted safe to package; best wait until
>>> the clever devs can find a proper fix for gnc-date.
>>>
>>> On Fri., 25 Jan. 2019, 05:46 Stephen M. Butler <kg7je at arrl.net
>> <mailto:kg7je at arrl.net>
>>> <mailto:kg7je at arrl.net <mailto:kg7je at arrl.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> OH! Light bulb on!
>>> OK. I understand what you said earlier. I'll put the patches
>>> back into
>>> the packaging.
>>>
>>> Thanks for clearing that up.
>>>
>>> --Steve
>>>
>>> PS Looking in manual for 'revert' command.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Stephen M Butler, PMP, PSM
>> Stephen.M.Butler51 at gmail.com <mailto:Stephen.M.Butler51 at gmail.com>
>> kg7je at arrl.net <mailto:kg7je at arrl.net>
>> 253-350-0166
>> -------------------------------------------
>> GnuPG Fingerprint: 8A25 9726 D439 758D D846 E5D4 282A 5477 0385 81D8
>>
>>
>
> --
> Stephen M Butler, PMP, PSM
> Stephen.M.Butler51 at gmail.com
> kg7je at arrl.net
> 253-350-0166
> -------------------------------------------
> GnuPG Fingerprint: 8A25 9726 D439 758D D846 E5D4 282A 5477 0385 81D8
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
More information about the gnucash-devel
mailing list