[GNC-dev] Test failure

[Stephen M. Butler]

On 1/26/19 11:20 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
>
> Ok my bad
>
> May be safer to reuse your own gnucash repository
>
>   * cd gnucash
>   * git remote add chris https://github.com/christopherlam/gnucash.git
>   * git fetch --all
>   * git checkout chris/maint-chartjs-budget-barchart
>   * dpkg etc
>
> and to revert to main branch:
>
>   * git checkout maint
>
>
Just a quick note before running out the door for the day.  It compiled
and passed test 109 (with the 3.4 build patch in place).  I'm presuming
you don't have the broken patch in this branch.


--Steve

PS  Saw the note from John and decided that was a 400 series course. 
Options -- too many options. 

>
> On 27/1/19 3:04 pm, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
>> On 1/26/19 10:54 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
>>> Stephen please spend some CPU burning time on my chartJS branch which
>>> needs beta testing?
>>>
>>> $git clone
>>> https://github.com/christopherlam/gnucash/tree/maint-chartjs-budget-barchart
>> Thought I'd start this while headed toward some z's.  Too tired to
>> figure out what happened.
>>
>>  git clone
>> https://github.com/christopherlam/gnucash/tree/maint-chartjs-budget-barchart
>> Cloning into 'maint-chartjs-budget-barchart'...
>> fatal: repository
>> 'https://github.com/christopherlam/gnucash/tree/maint-chartjs-budget-barchart/'
>> not found
>>
>>
>> --Steve
>>
>>> On 27/1/19 2:52 pm, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
>>>> On 1/26/19 10:29 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>>>>> Stephen,
>>>>>
>>>>> By all means learn about git bisect, it's an extremely useful
>>>>> troubleshooting tool. But don't exercise yourself too much about
>>>>> this particular failure, Chris and I know exactly what commit caused
>>>>> it and that the underlying cause is a bug in ICU (International
>>>>> Components for Unicode, http://site.icu-project.org/) versions 57-62.
>>>> I figured the devs were way ahead of me.  And I'm burning the CPU this
>>>> evening finding that I can't compile 3.4-21 thru (I'm guessing) 3.4-38.
>>>> I'm up to 3.4-29 at this point and already know that -37 and -38 don't
>>>> compile on my box.  But -39, -40, and -43 do.  Don't know about -41 and
>>>> -42 (and probably won't check them).
>>>>
>>>> Busy day tomorrow so I doubt the cpu will even get warmed up!  It's
>>>> pushing 11 pm so I'll call it quits on this exercise.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the details.
>>>>
>>>> --Steve
>>>>
>>>>> I had thought that the problem was confined to 1969, but tonight got
>>>>> https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=797067 which makes me think
>>>>> that it's every year, so more testing needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> John Ralls

-- 
Stephen M Butler, PMP, PSM
Stephen.M.Butler51 at gmail.com
kg7je at arrl.net
253-350-0166
-------------------------------------------
GnuPG Fingerprint:  8A25 9726 D439 758D D846 E5D4 282A 5477 0385 81D8